Topic 1 Question 972
A company currently runs an on-premises stock trading application by using Microsoft Windows Server. The company wants to migrate the application to the AWS Cloud.
The company needs to design a highly available solution that provides low-latency access to block storage across multiple Availability Zones.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST implementation effort?
Configure a Windows Server cluster that spans two Availability Zones on Amazon EC2 instances. Install the application on both cluster nodes. Use Amazon FSx for Windows File Server as shared storage between the two cluster nodes.
Configure a Windows Server cluster that spans two Availability Zones on Amazon EC2 instances. Install the application on both cluster nodes. Use Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) General Purpose SSD (gp3) volumes as storage attached to the EC2 instances. Set up application-level replication to sync data from one EBS volume in one Availability Zone to another EBS volume in the second Availability Zone.
Deploy the application on Amazon EC2 instances in two Availability Zones. Configure one EC2 instance as active and the second EC2 instance in standby mode. Use an Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP Multi-AZ file system to access the data by using Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) protocol.
Deploy the application on Amazon EC2 instances in two Availability Zones. Configure one EC2 instance as active and the second EC2 instance in standby mode. Use Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) volumes as storage attached to the EC2 instances. Set up Amazon EBS level replication to sync data from one io2 volume in one Availability Zone to another io2 volume in the second Availability Zone.
ユーザの投票
コメント(16)
Using Amazon FSx for Windows File Server would not be the best solution, as the company requires block storage, not file storage. D. Deploying the application on EC2 instances and using Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) volumes with EBS-level replication is the solution with the least implementation effort for the following reasons:
EBS volumes provide the required block storage for the application. Using EBS-level replication to sync data between Availability Zones is a built-in feature, requiring less implementation effort compared to setting up custom replication mechanisms. Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) volumes ensure the low-latency access to the block storage required by the application. By using Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) volumes with EBS-level replication, the company can meet the requirements for high availability and low-latency access to block storage with the least implementation effort.
👍 4martinadurcakova12024/10/09- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
due to this line in question "low-latency access to block storage" C looks appropriate.
👍 3rpmaws2024/09/14 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
block storage -> B or D io1, io2 support EBS Multi-Attach -> D
👍 3spoved2024/09/29
シャッフルモード