Topic 1 Question 971
A company that is in the ap-northeast-1 Region has a fleet of thousands of AWS Outposts servers. The company has deployed the servers at remote locations around the world. All the servers regularly download new software versions that consist of 100 files. There is significant latency before all servers run the new software versions.
The company must reduce the deployment latency for new software versions.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational overhead?
Create an Amazon S3 bucket in ap-northeast-1. Set up an Amazon CloudFront distribution in ap-northeast-1 that includes a CachingDisabled cache policy. Configure the S3 bucket as the origin. Download the software by using signed URLs.
Create an Amazon S3 bucket in ap-northeast-1. Create a second S3 bucket in the us-east-1 Region. Configure replication between the buckets. Set up an Amazon CloudFront distribution that uses ap-northeast-1 as the primary origin and us-east-1 as the secondary origin. Download the software by using signed URLs.
Create an Amazon S3 bucket in ap-northeast-1. Configure Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration. Download the software by using the S3 Transfer Acceleration endpoint.
Create an Amazon S3 bucket in ap-northeast-1. Set up an Amazon CloudFront distribution. Configure the S3 bucket as the origin. Download the software by using signed URLs.
ユーザの投票
コメント(13)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
By setting up a CloudFront distribution with the S3 bucket as the origin, the software versions can be cached at edge locations close to the remote AWS Outposts servers. This reduces the latency of downloading new software versions because the servers can access the content from the nearest CloudFront edge location instead of downloading it directly from the S3 bucket in the ap-northeast-1 Region. About option C: S3 Transfer Acceleration optimizes the upload and download of files to S3 by routing through optimized network paths. However, it is primarily designed to improve performance when transferring data over long distances to S3 (uploads). It does not provide the same level of global caching and latency reduction as CloudFront for large-scale distribution.
👍 7JoeTromundo2024/09/26 Option C is correct. Option D brings additional overhead in terms of setting up, so opted out.
Also from google : If you want to download software quickly from a large distance, you should generally use S3 Transfer Acceleration to download from your S3 bucket, as it leverages Amazon's global edge network to significantly speed up long-distance data transfers, making it ideal for large file downloads across continents; while CloudFront is better suited for delivering smaller content like website assets to users globally, where faster response times and caching are critical
👍 6ashishs1742024/09/21- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
S3 Transfer Acceleration speeds up uploads and downloads to S3 over long distances but does not provide the global caching benefits that CloudFront offers. CloudFront is more suitable for reducing latency when distributing content globally.
👍 4[Removed]2024/08/19
シャッフルモード