Topic 1 Question 53
Your software team is developing an on-premises web application that requires direct connectivity to Compute Engine Instances in GCP using the RFC 1918 address space. You want to choose a connectivity solution from your on-premises environment to GCP, given these specifications: ✑ Your ISP is a Google Partner Interconnect provider. ✑ Your on-premises VPN device's internet uplink and downlink speeds are 10 Gbps. ✑ A test VPN connection between your on-premises gateway and GCP is performing at a maximum speed of 500 Mbps due to packet losses. ✑ Most of the data transfer will be from GCP to the on-premises environment. ✑ The application can burst up to 1.5 Gbps during peak transfers over the Interconnect. ✑ Cost and the complexity of the solution should be minimal. How should you provision the connectivity solution?
Provision a Partner Interconnect through your ISP.
Provision a Dedicated Interconnect instead of a VPN.
Create multiple VPN tunnels to account for the packet losses, and increase bandwidth using ECMP.
Use network compression over your VPN to increase the amount of data you can send over your VPN.
ユーザの投票
コメント(17)
Answer is A,
cost and complexity of multiple tunnel vpn is very high, also , dedicated interconnect is not required as required max speed is 1.5gbps Also , direct connectivity is bogus verb, all the solution provide direct connectivity to your vpc instance , once connected through router
👍 22garbad2021/01/17Everybody that says C please do not take this exam and never be consulted for network related question ...
👍 9JohnnyBG2021/07/24I would vote for A because of this statement " Most of the data transfer will be from GCP to the on-premises environment.".
According to the documentation, carrier peering "Has reduced internet egress rates to your on-premises network " while Cloud VPN "Has standard egress rates for traffic sent through an Interconnect connection;" https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/how-to/choose-product#cp-compare
👍 4ThisisJohn2021/11/05
シャッフルモード