Topic 1 Question 35
A company is storing data on premises on a Windows file server. The company produces 5 GB of new data daily. The company migrated part of its Windows-based workload to AWS and needs the data to be available on a file system in the cloud. The company already has established an AWS Direct Connect connection between the on-premises network and AWS. Which data migration strategy should the company use?
Use the file gateway option in AWS Storage Gateway to replace the existing Windows file server, and point the existing file share to the new file gateway.
Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon FSx.
Use AWS Data Pipeline to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
ユーザの投票
コメント(12)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
B. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon FSx. D. Use AWS DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate data between the on-premises Windows file server and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) are also valid options. They both use DataSync to schedule a daily task to replicate the data between on-premises and cloud, the main difference is the type of file system in the cloud, Amazon FSx or Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
👍 8masetromain2023/01/13 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B👍 3masetromain2022/12/13
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
My initial thought was A, but the solution requires data to be available in the cloud, not to replace a Windows File server with a Cloud-based sol'n-like storage gateway. So B is correct.
👍 3oatif2023/02/04
シャッフルモード