Topic 1 Question 310
A company wants to use Amazon S3 to back up its on-premises file storage solution. The company’s on-premises file storage solution supports NFS, and the company wants its new solution to support NFS. The company wants to archive the backup files after 5 days. If the company needs archived files for disaster recovery, the company is willing to wait a few days for the retrieval of those files.
Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway file gateway that is associated with an S3 bucket. Move the files from the on-premises file storage solution to the file gateway. Create an S3 Lifecycle rule to move the files to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 5 days.
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway volume gateway that is associated with an S3 bucket. Move the files from the on-premises file storage solution to the volume gateway. Create an S3 Lifecycle rule to move the files to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 5 days.
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway tape gateway that is associated with an S3 bucket. Move the files from the on-premises file storage solution to the tape gateway. Create an S3 Lifecycle rule to move the files to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 5 days.
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway file gateway that is associated with an S3 bucket. Move the files from the on-premises file storage solution to the file gateway. Create an S3 Lifecycle rule to move the files to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 5 days.
ユーザの投票
コメント(6)
Answer: D
using AWS Storage file is appropriate and straight to S3 Glacier Deep Archive is most cost efficient as the company is willing to wait a few days for the retrieval of those files in case of DR
👍 3airgead2023/10/28- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
File Gateway Glacier
👍 3Ustad2023/11/02 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
D - File Gateway supports NFS and Deep Glacier is the cheapest storage option in S3
👍 2s612023/10/30
シャッフルモード