Topic 1 Question 995
A streaming media company is rebuilding its infrastructure to accommodate increasing demand for video content that users consume daily.
The company needs to process terabyte-sized videos to block some content in the videos. Video processing can take up to 20 minutes.
The company needs a solution that will scale with demand and remain cost-effective.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Use AWS Lambda functions to process videos. Store video metadata in Amazon DynamoDB. Store video content in Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering.
Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and AWS Fargate to implement microservices to process videos. Store video metadata in Amazon Aurora. Store video content in Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering.
Use Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) to process videos. Store video content in Amazon S3 Standard. Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) for queuing and to decouple processing tasks.
Deploy a containerized video processing application on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) on Amazon EC2. Store video metadata in Amazon RDS in a single Availability Zone. Store video content in Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
ユーザの投票
コメント(8)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
S3 Intelligent-Tiering is cost-effective for storing large amounts of video content, and since Lambda doesn't work, shouldn't we consider serverless?
👍 7kbgsgsgs2024/10/04 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
A - Video processing can take up to 20 minutes. So lambda is not suitable here. B - Fargate allows running containers without managing EC2 instances, scaling automatically based on demand. Besides, S3 Intelligent-Tiering is cost-effective for storing large video files. C - I gotta say, the SQS is a really good choice here! It's just that S3 Standard is more expensive than S3 Intelligent-Tiering for large files, and that EC2 (even with Auto Scaling) requires managing the underlying infrastructure. D - EKS is more complex to set up but the real issue is that RDS in a single Availability Zone introduces a single point of failure, so scalability and reliability can't be met. Also, S3 Glacier Deep Archive is designed for long-term archival storage with high latency and not suitable for frequently accessed video content.
👍 4LeonSauveterre2025/01/08 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
I personally think C, I could be wrong.
👍 2blehbleh2024/10/01
シャッフルモード