Topic 1 Question 896
A company is designing its production application's disaster recovery (DR) strategy. The application is backed by a MySQL database on an Amazon Aurora cluster in the us-east-1 Region. The company has chosen the us-west-1 Region as its DR Region.
The company's target recovery point objective (RPO) is 5 minutes and the target recovery time objective (RTO) is 20 minutes. The company wants to minimize configuration changes.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the MOST operational efficiency?
Create an Aurora read replica in us-west-1 similar in size to the production application's Aurora MySQL cluster writer instance.
Convert the Aurora cluster to an Aurora global database. Configure managed failover.
Create a new Aurora cluster in us-west-1 that has Cross-Region Replication.
Create a new Aurora cluster in us-west-1. Use AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to sync both clusters.
ユーザの投票
コメント(5)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Aurora Global Database: allowing a single Amazon Aurora database to span multiple AWS Regions. It replicates your data with no impact on database performance, enables fast local reads with low latency in each Region, and provides disaster recovery from Region-wide outages.
👍 3sandordini2024/04/30 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Answer:B
https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/global-database/
Cross-Region disaster recovery If your primary Region suffers a performance degradation or outage, you can promote one of the secondary Regions to take read/write responsibilities. An Aurora cluster can recover in less than 1 minute, even in the event of a complete Regional outage. This provides your application with an effective recovery point objective (RPO) of 1 second and a recovery time objective (RTO) of less than 1 minute, providing a strong foundation for a global business continuity plan.
👍 3Scheldon2024/05/23 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
I go for B. However, C is also a good option except manual failover intervention
👍 2EdricHoang2024/07/06
シャッフルモード