Examtopics

コメント(17)

• 正解だと思う選択肢: B

  this question is too vague imho if the question is looking for a way to incur charges to the European company instead of the US company, then requester pay makes sense.

  if they are looking to reduce overall data transfer cost, then B makes sense because the data does not leave the AWS network, thus data transfer cost should be lower technically?

  A. makes sense because the US company saves money, but the European company is paying for the charges so there is no overall saving in cost when you look at the big picture

  I will go for B because they are not explicitly stating that they want the other company to pay for the charges

  👍 38

  Six_Fingered_Jose2022/10/24
• 正解だと思う選択肢: A

  "Typically, you configure buckets to be Requester Pays buckets when you want to share data but not incur charges associated with others accessing the data. For example, you might use Requester Pays buckets when making available large datasets, such as zip code directories, reference data, geospatial information, or web crawling data." https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/RequesterPaysBuckets.html

  👍 22

  123jhl02022/10/18
• 正解だと思う選択肢: A

  If A is acceptable (A. Configure the Requester Pays feature ), C might be also:

  C. Configure cross-account access for the marketing firm so that the marketing firm has access to the company's S3 bucket.

  as the marketing company has to pay to download the data (it's cheap, around0,09 USD por GB first 10 TB/moth so 3 TB is 276 USD)

  Isn't it?

  👍 1

  jdr752023/04/04