Topic 1 Question 851
A large company wants to provide its globally located developers separate, limited size, managed PostgreSQL databases for development purposes. The databases will be low volume. The developers need the databases only when they are actively working.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Give the developers the ability to launch separate Amazon Aurora instances. Set up a process to shut down Aurora instances at the end of the workday and to start Aurora instances at the beginning of the next workday.
Develop an AWS Service Catalog product that enforces size restrictions for launching Amazon Aurora instances. Give the developers access to launch the product when they need a development database.
Create an Amazon Aurora Serverless cluster. Develop an AWS Service Catalog product to launch databases in the cluster with the default capacity settings. Grant the developers access to the product.
Monitor AWS Trusted Advisor checks for idle Amazon RDS databases. Create a process to terminate identified idle RDS databases.
ユーザの投票
コメント(13)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
(A,B,D) eliminated. Aurora instances & Amazon RDS use On-Demand or Reserved INSTANCES. These are more expensive than a serverless solution.
(C) is correct. Amazon Aurora Serverless automatically starts up, shuts down & scales capacity up or down based on your application's needs; you pay only for capacity consumed.
👍 7NSA_Poker2024/06/17 Yes but its asking for the most cost effective. B would cause frustration for developers if it was terminated unexpectedly. The answer should be C so developers can easily access when they are needed and auto scales based on demand
👍 6kelmryan12024/04/30- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
I thin is c
👍 3Sergiuss952024/05/03
シャッフルモード