Topic 1 Question 835
A company is expanding a secure on-premises network to the AWS Cloud by using an AWS Direct Connect connection. The on-premises network has no direct internet access. An application that runs on the on-premises network needs to use an Amazon S3 bucket.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Create a public virtual interface (VIF). Route the AWS traffic over the public VIF.
Create a VPC and a NAT gateway. Route the AWS traffic from the on-premises network to the NAT gateway.
Create a VPC and an Amazon S3 interface endpoint. Route the AWS traffic from the on-premises network to the S3 interface endpoint.
Create a VPC peering connection between the on-premises network and Direct Connect. Route the AWS traffic over the peering connection.
ユーザの投票
コメント(10)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
B Need internet A,D doesn't conect to the s3 IMO, C is the solution for this question.
👍 4waldirlsantos2024/04/13 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
AnswerC
Amazon S3 interface endpoint seems to be the best and only option as we are forced to use Private IP addressation.
Interface endpoints for Amazon S3 Your network traffic remains on the AWS network. Use private IP addresses from your VPC to access Amazon S3 Require endpoint-specific Amazon S3 DNS names Allow access from on premises Allow access from a VPC in another AWS Region by using VPC peering or AWS Transit Gateway
👍 4Scheldon2024/06/08 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C👍 2Kaula2024/03/23
シャッフルモード