Topic 1 Question 827
A company is planning to deploy its application on an Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Serverless v2 cluster. The application will receive large amounts of traffic. The company wants to optimize the storage performance of the cluster as the load on the application increases.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Configure the cluster to use the Aurora Standard storage configuration.
Configure the cluster storage type as Provisioned IOPS.
Configure the cluster storage type as General Purpose.
Configure the cluster to use the Aurora I/O-Optimized storage configuration.
ユーザの投票
コメント(12)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
AnswerD
For Aurora we have 2 storage type/options: A - Standard B -- I/O-Optimized hence answers B and C options are incorrect. Because customer inform us that there will be a big amount of traffic for their application I would go with I/O-Optimized. Maybe we are giving more $$ per GB-month but we are not paing for I/O operations/request.
https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/
In general question is not precise and it is hard to say which option will be more beneficial (cost effective)
👍 5Scheldon2024/06/10 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
Aurora I/O-Optimized – Improved price performance and predictability for I/O-intensive applications. You pay only for the usage and storage of your DB clusters, with no additional charges for read and write I/O operations.
👍 4joseantoniopolo2024/04/05 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2023/05/amazon-aurora-i-o-optimized/ Aurora I/O-Optimized offers up to 40% cost savings for I/O-intensive applications where I/O charges exceed 25% of the total Aurora database spend.
👍 3xBUGx2024/03/24
シャッフルモード