Topic 1 Question 52
A company wants to migrate its on-premises application to AWS. The application produces output files that vary in size from tens of gigabytes to hundreds of terabytes. The application data must be stored in a standard file system structure. The company wants a solution that scales automatically. is highly available, and requires minimum operational overhead. Which solution will meet these requirements?
Migrate the application to run as containers on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS). Use Amazon S3 for storage.
Migrate the application to run as containers on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). Use Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) for storage.
Migrate the application to Amazon EC2 instances in a Multi-AZ Auto Scaling group. Use Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) for storage.
Migrate the application to Amazon EC2 instances in a Multi-AZ Auto Scaling group. Use Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) for storage.
ユーザの投票
コメント(17)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
EFS is a standard file system, it scales automatically and is highly available.
👍 16ArielSchivo2022/10/18 I have absolutely no idea...
Output files that vary in size from tens of gigabytes to hundreds of terabytes
Simit size for a single object: S3 5To TiB https://aws.amazon.com/fr/blogs/aws/amazon-s3-object-size-limit/ EBS 64 Tib https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_constraints.html EFS 47.9 TiB https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/limits.html
👍 7masetromain2022/10/12- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
Highly available & Autoscales == Multi-AZ Auto Scaling group. Standard File System == Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
👍 3benaws2022/12/11
シャッフルモード