Topic 1 Question 511
A company is developing software that uses a PostgreSQL database schema. The company needs to configure multiple development environments and databases for the company's developers. On average, each development environment is used for half of the 8-hour workday.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Configure each development environment with its own Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL database
Configure each development environment with its own Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL Single-AZ DB instances
Configure each development environment with its own Amazon Aurora On-Demand PostgreSQL-Compatible database
Configure each development environment with its own Amazon S3 bucket by using Amazon S3 Object Select
ユーザの投票
コメント(7)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
Option C suggests using Amazon Aurora On-Demand PostgreSQL-Compatible databases for each development environment. This option provides the benefits of Amazon Aurora, which is a high-performance and scalable database engine, while allowing you to pay for usage on an on-demand basis. Amazon Aurora On-Demand instances are typically more cost-effective for individual development environments compared to the provisioned capacity options.
👍 6LONGMEN2023/05/19 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
c cost effectively
👍 2nosense2023/05/17 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Amazon Aurora, whether On-Demand or not (Option A and C), provides higher performance and is more intended for production environments. It also typically has a higher cost compared to RDS,
👍 2Rob1L2023/05/20
シャッフルモード