Topic 1 Question 486
A company is building a three-tier application on AWS. The presentation tier will serve a static website The logic tier is a containerized application. This application will store data in a relational database. The company wants to simplify deployment and to reduce operational costs.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Use Amazon S3 to host static content. Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with AWS Fargate for compute power. Use a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database.
Use Amazon CloudFront to host static content. Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with Amazon EC2 for compute power. Use a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database.
Use Amazon S3 to host static content. Use Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with AWS Fargate for compute power. Use a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database.
Use Amazon EC2 Reserved Instances to host static content. Use Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with Amazon EC2 for compute power. Use a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database.
ユーザの投票
コメント(2)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: A
Amazon S3 is a highly scalable and cost-effective storage service that can be used to host static website content. It provides durability, high availability, and low latency access to the static files.
Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate eliminates the need to manage the underlying infrastructure. It allows you to run containerized applications without provisioning or managing EC2 instances. This reduces operational overhead and provides scalability.
By using a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database, you can offload the management tasks such as backups, patching, and monitoring to AWS. This reduces the operational burden and ensures high availability and durability of the database.
👍 3LONGMEN2023/05/18 - 正解だと思う選択肢: A
ECS is slightly cheaper than EKS
👍 2Yadav_Sanjay2023/05/22
シャッフルモード