Topic 1 Question 409
A solutions architect must migrate a Windows Internet Information Services (IIS) web application to AWS. The application currently relies on a file share hosted in the user's on-premises network-attached storage (NAS). The solutions architect has proposed migrating the IIS web servers to Amazon EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones that are connected to the storage solution, and configuring an Elastic Load Balancer attached to the instances.
Which replacement to the on-premises file share is MOST resilient and durable?
Migrate the file share to Amazon RDS.
Migrate the file share to AWS Storage Gateway.
Migrate the file share to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.
Migrate the file share to Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).
ユーザの投票
コメント(11)
Obviously C is the correct answer - FSx for Windows - Windows
👍 4Grace832023/03/20- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
A) RDS is a database service B) Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that connects on-premises applications to AWS storage services. D) provides shared file storage for Linux-based workloads, but it does not natively support Windows-based workloads.
👍 4channn2023/04/01 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
The most resilient and durable replacement for the on-premises file share in this scenario would be Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.
Amazon FSx is a fully managed Windows file system service that is built on Windows Server and provides native support for the SMB protocol. It is designed to be highly available and durable, with built-in backup and restore capabilities. It is also fully integrated with AWS security services, providing encryption at rest and in transit, and it can be configured to meet compliance standards.
👍 3Buruguduystunstugudunstuy2023/03/25
シャッフルモード