Topic 1 Question 38
A company is hosting a static website on Amazon S3 and is using Amazon Route 53 for DNS. The website is experiencing increased demand from around the world. The company must decrease latency for users who access the website. Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Replicate the S3 bucket that contains the website to all AWS Regions. Add Route 53 geolocation routing entries.
Provision accelerators in AWS Global Accelerator. Associate the supplied IP addresses with the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the IP addresses of the accelerators.
Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.
Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration on the bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the new endpoint.
ユーザの投票
コメント(17)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
The correct answer is C: Add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket. Edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution.
Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that speeds up the delivery of static and dynamic web content, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and images. It does this by placing cache servers in locations around the world, which store copies of the content and serve it to users from the location that is nearest to them.
To decrease latency for users who access the static website hosted on Amazon S3, you can add an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the S3 bucket and edit the Route 53 entries to point to the CloudFront distribution. This will allow CloudFront to cache the content of the website at locations around the world, which will reduce the time it takes for users to access the website by serving it from the location that is nearest to them.
👍 3Buruguduystunstugudunstuy2022/12/19 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
C. S3 accelerator is best for uploads to S3, whereas Cloudfront is for content delivery. S3 static website can be the origin which is distributed to Cloudfront and routed by Route 53.
👍 3Ello20232023/02/06 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
decrease latency and most cost-effective = cloudfront in front of S3 bucket (content can be served closer to the user, reducing latency). Replicating S3 bucket and Global accelerator would also decrease latency but would be less cost-effective. Transfer accelerator wouldn't decrease latency since it's not for delivering content, but for transfering it
👍 2pazabal2022/12/20
シャッフルモード