Topic 1 Question 372
A company wants to migrate an Oracle database to AWS. The database consists of a single table that contains millions of geographic information systems (GIS) images that are high resolution and are identified by a geographic code.
When a natural disaster occurs, tens of thousands of images get updated every few minutes. Each geographic code has a single image or row that is associated with it. The company wants a solution that is highly available and scalable during such events.
Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Store the images and geographic codes in a database table. Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance.
Store the images in Amazon S3 buckets. Use Amazon DynamoDB with the geographic code as the key and the image S3 URL as the value.
Store the images and geographic codes in an Amazon DynamoDB table. Configure DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) during times of high load.
Store the images in Amazon S3 buckets. Store geographic codes and image S3 URLs in a database table. Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance.
ユーザの投票
コメント(11)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
The company wants a solution that is highly available and scalable
👍 7Karlos992023/03/12 Guys, "A company wants to migrate an Oracle database to AWS" Isn't Oracle SQL based? So doesn't it mean that DynamoDB is rolled out?
👍 4kels12023/04/20- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Option B is the right answer . You cannot store high resolution images in DynamoDB due to its limitation - Maximum size of an item is 400KB
👍 3KAUS22023/03/12
シャッフルモード