Topic 1 Question 205
A company hosts a marketing website in an on-premises data center. The website consists of static documents and runs on a single server. An administrator updates the website content infrequently and uses an SFTP client to upload new documents.
The company decides to host its website on AWS and to use Amazon CloudFront. The company’s solutions architect creates a CloudFront distribution. The solutions architect must design the most cost-effective and resilient architecture for website hosting to serve as the CloudFront origin.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Create a virtual server by using Amazon Lightsail. Configure the web server in the Lightsail instance. Upload website content by using an SFTP client.
Create an AWS Auto Scaling group for Amazon EC2 instances. Use an Application Load Balancer. Upload website content by using an SFTP client.
Create a private Amazon S3 bucket. Use an S3 bucket policy to allow access from a CloudFront origin access identity (OAI). Upload website content by using the AWS CLI.
Create a public Amazon S3 bucket. Configure AWS Transfer for SFTP. Configure the S3 bucket for website hosting. Upload website content by using the SFTP client.
ユーザの投票
コメント(17)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: C
AWS transfer is a cost and doesn't mention using CloudFront https://aws.amazon.com/aws-transfer-family/pricing/
👍 4bdp1232023/02/16 - 正解だと思う選択肢: C
Option C is a better choice than D for following reasons: (1) Cost effective: data transfer is cheaper for Cloudfront than directly from S3 bucket (2) Resilient: recovery from failures. Having a Cloudfront distribution and making S3 bucket policy only for Cloudfront. ie. private bucket (with OAI for access) hardens and betters resiliency.
👍 3Mahadeva2023/01/09 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
D make more sense overall….
werid question....
👍 2nexus20202022/12/14
シャッフルモード