Topic 1 Question 173
A gaming company hosts a browser-based application on AWS. The users of the application consume a large number of videos and images that are stored in Amazon S3. This content is the same for all users.
The application has increased in popularity, and millions of users worldwide accessing these media files. The company wants to provide the files to the users while reducing the load on the origin.
Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Deploy an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator in front of the web servers.
Deploy an Amazon CloudFront web distribution in front of the S3 bucket.
Deploy an Amazon ElastiCache for Redis instance in front of the web servers.
Deploy an Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached instance in front of the web servers.
ユーザの投票
コメント(8)
B. Cloud front is best for content delivery. Global Accelerator is best for non-HTTP (TCP/UDP) cases and supports HTTP cases as well but with static IP (elastic IP) or anycast IP address only.
👍 16Nigma2022/11/15- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
To provide media files to users while reducing the load on the origin and meeting the requirements cost-effectively, the gaming company should deploy an Amazon CloudFront web distribution in front of the S3 bucket (Option B).
CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that speeds up the delivery of static and dynamic web content, such as images and videos, to users. By using CloudFront, the media files will be served to users from the edge location that is closest to them, resulting in faster delivery and a better user experience. CloudFront can also handle the high traffic and large number of requests expected from the millions of users, ensuring that the media files are available and accessible to users around the world.
👍 3Buruguduystunstugudunstuy2022/12/22 B is correct
👍 1Wpcorgan2022/11/22
シャッフルモード