Topic 1 Question 147
A company needs to retain application log files for a critical application for 10 years. The application team regularly accesses logs from the past month for troubleshooting, but logs older than 1 month are rarely accessed. The application generates more than 10 TB of logs per month. Which storage option meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Store the logs in Amazon S3. Use AWS Backup to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
Store the logs in Amazon S3. Use S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
Store the logs in Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Use AWS Backup to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
Store the logs in Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Use Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies to move logs more than 1 month old to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
ユーザの投票
コメント(8)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Why not AwsBackup? No Glacier Deep is supported by AWS Backup
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/aws-backup/latest/devguide/s3-backups.html AWS Backup allows you to backup your S3 data stored in the following S3 Storage Classes: • S3 Standard • S3 Standard - Infrequently Access (IA) • S3 One Zone-IA • S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval • S3 Intelligent-Tiering (S3 INT)
👍 6rjam2022/11/16 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
S3 + Glacier is the most cost effective.
👍 3ArielSchivo2022/11/09 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B👍 1masetromain2022/11/02
シャッフルモード