Topic 1 Question 118
A company is building a web-based application running on Amazon EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones. The web application will provide access to a repository of text documents totaling about 900 TB in size. The company anticipates that the web application will experience periods of high demand. A solutions architect must ensure that the storage component for the text documents can scale to meet the demand of the application at all times. The company is concerned about the overall cost of the solution. Which storage solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS)
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
Amazon OpenSearch Service (Amazon Elasticsearch Service)
Amazon S3
ユーザの投票
コメント(17)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
Only EFS and S3, Since EFS is make it much costly, S3 is the viable option
👍 4PS_R2022/11/08 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
Only EFS and S3 meeting the requirements but S3 is better option because it is cheaper.
👍 4NikaCZ2022/12/17 - 正解だと思う選択肢: D
A. It is Not a block storage B. It is Not a file storage C. Opensearch is useful but can only accommodate up to 600TiB and is mainly for search and anaytics. D. S3 is more cost effective than all and can handle all objects like Block, File or Text.
👍 4Help20232023/02/19
シャッフルモード