Topic 1 Question 1003
A company runs its media rendering application on premises. The company wants to reduce storage costs and has moved all data to Amazon S3. The on-premises rendering application needs low-latency access to storage.
The company needs to design a storage solution for the application. The storage solution must maintain the desired application performance.
Which storage solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Use Mountpoint for Amazon S3 to access the data in Amazon S3 for the on-premises application.
Configure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.
Copy the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Configure an Amazon FSx File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.
Configure an on-premises file server. Use the Amazon S3 API to connect to S3 storage. Configure the application to access the storage from the on-premises file server.
ユーザの投票
コメント(3)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
B. Configure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.
Explanation: Amazon S3 File Gateway provides a way for on-premises applications to access objects stored in Amazon S3 as files. It caches frequently accessed data locally, which ensures low-latency access to the data. This is crucial for maintaining the performance of the rendering application.
By keeping the data in Amazon S3, the company benefits from lower storage costs compared to using other storage services like Amazon FSx, while still providing the necessary performance for the on-premises application through the local caching capabilities of the File Gateway.
The File Gateway seamlessly integrates with Amazon S3, allowing the application to access data using standard file protocols like NFS or SMB, which simplifies the setup.
👍 3Bwhizzy2024/10/19 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
A - Mountpoint is not designed for on-premises environments or low-latency access; it works well for cloud-based applications. B - Amazon S3 File Gateway provides low-latency, on-premises access to data stored in Amazon S3 through a file-based interface. It caches frequently accessed data locally to reduce latency. C - Copying data to FSx increases costs, as FSx storage is more expensive than S3. Let alone unnecessary complexity. D - Direct interaction with S3 introduces higher latency for on-premises applications and lacks local caching.
👍 3LeonSauveterre2025/01/08 Amazon S3 File Gateway enables your existing file-based applications, devices, and workflows to use Amazon S3, without modification. Amazon S3 File Gateway securely and durably stores both file contents and metadata as objects, while providing your on-premises applications low-latency access to cached data.
👍 2Americanman2024/11/22
シャッフルモード