Topic 1 Question 505
A company is creating a new application that gives users the ability to upload and share short video files. The average size of the video files is 10 MB. After a user uploads a file, a message needs to be placed into an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue so the file can be processed. The files need to be accessible for processing within 5 minutes.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Write the files to Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive. Add the S3 location of the files to the SQS queue.
Write the files to Amazon S3 Standard. Add the S3 location of the files to the SQS queue.
Write the files to an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) General Purpose SSD volume. Add the EBS location of the files to the SQS queue.
Write messages that contain the contents of the uploaded files to the SQS queue.
ユーザの投票
コメント(4)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
S3 so it still can be accessed.
👍 3Dahlia95242024/12/09 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
s3 is cost effective compared to EBS
👍 2ShakthiGCP2024/12/20 - 正解だと思う選択肢: B
Amazon S3 Standard is the most appropriate storage class for frequently accessed data, such as video files that need to be processed quickly (within 5 minutes).
👍 2e8868352025/02/05
シャッフルモード