Topic 1 Question 560
A company needs to use AWS technology to deploy a static website.
Which solution meets this requirement with the LEAST amount of operational overhead?
Deploy the website on Amazon EC2.
Host the website on AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Deploy the website with Amazon Lightsail.
Host the website on Amazon S3.
ユーザの投票
コメント(3)
I found this question to be a bit tricky since Amazon Lightsail is similar in terms of building websites, web applications and deals with static IP addresses. But then I found this: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/WebsiteHosting.html "You can use Amazon S3 to host a static website. On a static website, individual webpages include static content. They might also contain client-side scripts."
👍 3its_tima2024/10/01Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is ideal for hosting static websites with minimal operational overhead. It allows you to store and serve static content (like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files) directly from S3 buckets without needing to manage any servers or complex infrastructure. Additionally, Amazon S3 is highly scalable, cost-effective, and requires very little maintenance.
👍 2Yomijohnson2024/11/12- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
D. Host the website on Amazon S3.
👍 1ShaiTay2024/11/14
シャッフルモード