Topic 1 Question 89
A company uses a 1 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connection to connect its AWS environment to its on-premises data center. The connection provides employees with access to an application VPC that is hosted on AWS. Many remote employees use a company-provided VPN to connect to the data center. These employees are reporting slowness when they access the application during business hours. On-premises users have started to report similar slowness while they are in the office.
The company plans to build an additional application on AWS. On-site and remote employees will use the additional application. After the deployment of this additional application, the company will need 20% more bandwidth than the company currently uses. With the increased usage, the company wants to add resiliency to the AWS connectivity. A network engineer must review the current implementation and must make improvements within a limited budget.
What should the network engineer do to meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Set up a new 1 Gbps Direct Connect dedicated connection to accommodate the additional traffic load from remote employees and the additional application. Create a link aggregation group (LAG).
Deploy an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection to the application VPC. Configure the on-premises routing for the remote employees to connect to the Site-to-Site VPN connection.
Deploy Amazon Workspaces into the application VPInstruct the remote employees to connect to Workspaces.
Replace the existing 1 Gbps Direct Connect connection with two new 2 Gbps Direct Connect hosted connections. Create an AWS Client VPN endpoint in the application VPC. Instruct the remote employees to connect to the Client VPN endpoint.
ユーザの投票
コメント(5)
- 正解だと思う選択肢: D
A) If current 1 Gbps Direct Connect is not enough for on-premises users adding another 1 Gbps Direct Connect will not add resiliency. In case of one Direct Connect link failure there will be not enough bandwidth. Especially with new app and increased by 20% usage. B) No resiliency. In case of VPN S2S failure 1 Gbps Direct connect won't be sufficient for on-premises and remote users. C) Very expensive D) Should work. In case of one link failure single 2 Gbps Direct Connect hosted connection will be sufficient to handle all the traffic for on-premises users. Remote users will connect by AWS client VPN directly to VPC.
👍 2tom_cat2023/05/01 D make sense
👍 2tcp222023/05/03- 正解だと思う選択肢: B
deploying an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection and configuring on-premises routing for remote employees would be the most cost-effective solution while meeting the company's requirements for increased bandwidth and resiliency.
👍 1takecoffe2023/05/26
シャッフルモード